<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ESL Podcast Blog &#187; Television and Movies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/category/television-and-movies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:48:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Desert Island Companion</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2010/03/02/desert-island-companion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2010/03/02/desert-island-companion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Lucy Tse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/?p=1502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I often come across desert island questions, asking if we were stranded on (not able to leave) a desert island, or a deserted island, that is uninhabited (with no people, other than me), what would we want to bring along?  It&#8217;s not too difficult to select our favorite books or movies to accompany (go with) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-1510" href="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2010/03/02/desert-island-companion/800px-lakshadweepisland/"><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-1510" style="margin: 20px;" title="800px-lakshadweepisland" src="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/800px-lakshadweepisland-150x150.jpg" alt="800px-lakshadweepisland" width="150" height="150" /></a>I often come across desert island questions, asking if we were <strong>stranded on</strong> (not able to leave) a<strong> desert island</strong>, or a <strong>deserted island</strong>, that is <strong>uninhabited</strong> (with no people, other than me), what would we want to bring along?  It&#8217;s not too difficult to select our favorite books or movies to <strong>accompany</strong> (go with) us to our lonely new home, I think.</p>
<p>But what if you were stranded on a desert island and given the chance to have one <strong>companion</strong>, someone to <strong>keep you company</strong> (give you friendship or companionship)?  This person <span style="text-decoration: underline;">cannot</span> be a relative or even someone you know personally, such as your <strong>spouse</strong> (husband/wife), boyfriend/girlfriend, or best friend.  It must be a <strong>historical figure</strong> (someone famous from the past) or a character from books, movies, or TV shows.</p>
<p>Of course, those of you who are <strong>practical-minded</strong> (thinking of and doing the most useful things) may immediately think of someone like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Macgiver">MacGyver</a>, or someone else who is extremely <strong>resourceful</strong> (able to do a lot with only a little), to help you on the island. This person would certainly be helpful as a companion, so let&#8217;s assume he&#8217;s already on the island with you.</p>
<p>The question is:  If you were picking someone else to be on your desert island, who would you pick?</p>
<p>You might be interested to know that when I asked Jeff this question, first he said he might pick someone like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socrates">Socrates</a> or <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Einstein">Albert Einstein</a>.  And then, he thought for a minute and asked me, &#8220;Is my wife dead?&#8221; so we know where his mind was going&#8230;and of course, we don&#8217;t <strong>blame him</strong> (say that he did something wrong)!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still trying to decide. I think I would pick someone who is a great storyteller to help me pass the time.</p>
<p>Who would you pick and why?</p>
<p>~ Lucy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2010/03/02/desert-island-companion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Typical American: Television Comedies</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/12/17/your-typical-american-television-comedies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/12/17/your-typical-american-television-comedies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 18:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jeff McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life in the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/?p=2235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week I talked about what Americans do and like as it relates to food, based on a book called What Americans Really Want&#8230; Really by Dr. Frank Luntz.  In one section of the book, Luntz discusses what makes a popular television comedy show in the U.S.  Here are his five guidelines (suggestions or rules) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="TV" href="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/12/10/your-typical-american-grocery-shopping/" target="_blank"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-2251" style="margin: 10px;" title="Friends_titles" src="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Friends_titles.jpg" alt="Friends_titles" width="136" height="102" />Last week</a> I talked about what Americans do and like as it relates to food, based on a book called <em>What Americans Really Want&#8230; Really</em> by Dr. Frank Luntz.  In one section of the book, Luntz discusses what makes a popular television comedy show in the U.S.  Here are his five <strong>guidelines</strong> (suggestions or rules) on what makes a good <strong>sitcom</strong> (situation comedy, a comedy about a certain group of people).  See if this list <strong>holds true</strong> (is true, is the same) for comedy programs you watch in your own language:</p>
<p><strong>1.  Hold up a mirror</strong>.  <strong>To hold up a mirror</strong> means to put a mirror in your hands to see what you look like.  This is exactly what Americans like to see in their sitcoms &#8212; themselves!  Luntz says that people want &#8220;shows and characters they can personally <strong>relate to</strong>,&#8221; meaning programs and people that they can feel connected to.  This may mean people of the same race or geography, or perhaps even the kinds of jobs they have.  But more generally, I think it means that the situations that are part of the show have to be situations that many of us are familiar with.  (Remember, we&#8217;re talking about comedy shows, not dramas.  One of the most popular kinds of drama shows involves police officers and lawyers, things with which, I hope, most of us are not very familiar.)</p>
<p><strong>2.  Connect the dots.</strong> The expression <strong>to connect the dots</strong> means that you have to see the connection between things that may seem otherwise unrelated.  For Americans, apparently they want the television show itself to connect the dots, meaning that they want the relationship between different events to be very obvious.  For example, Americans sometimes don&#8217;t watch every episode or show of a television program each week, but they want to be able to come back to the show later and still be able to understand what is happening in the story.  It can&#8217;t be too confusing for them &#8212; I mean, for <em>us</em>! &#8212; such that we don&#8217;t have to have seen the previous shows to understand the one we&#8217;re watching now.</p>
<p><strong>3.  Relationships involving conflict.</strong> Nowadays, Americans no longer want <strong>sweet, innocent</strong> comedy.  That is, they don&#8217;t necessarily want comedies where everything is nice and everyone gets along with everyone else.  Instead, they want <strong>conflict</strong> (disagreement) among the characters.  They want what we would call an <strong>edge</strong>, something that is a little <strong>dark</strong> (sad or tragic) but still <strong>lovable</strong> (something you can like or appreciate).  A good example of this would be the popular television show <em>The Simpsons</em>.</p>
<p><strong>4.  Home is where comedy lives.</strong> Americans like comedies about people in their homes rather than their office.  (This is not always true, since one of the most popular comedies on television nowadays is a show called <em>The Office</em>, but perhaps Luntz does not consider this a sitcom.)</p>
<p><strong>5.  Go live.</strong> There are very few comedies that are <strong>live</strong> &#8212; that is, when what you are watching on television is actually taking place at the same time in the television studio.  I&#8217;m not quite sure why Luntz included this in the list, since he could name only one show that has recently done this.  Even most <strong>talk shows</strong> (interview shows) are &#8220;<strong>taped</strong>&#8221; or recorded rather than live.</p>
<p>I think these observations are generally true, although I don&#8217;t watch very many sitcoms anymore, and the ones that I have seen I think are pretty awful, so perhaps I am not the best judge.</p>
<p>~Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/12/17/your-typical-american-television-comedies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood, (Former) Capital of Movies and Television</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/10/08/hollywood-former-capital-of-movies-and-television/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/10/08/hollywood-former-capital-of-movies-and-television/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jeff McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/?p=1827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many actors dream of coming to &#8220;Hollywood&#8221; to make it big (to be a big success), and a few are probably surprised to learn that there is no city of Hollywood in California. Hollywood is actually just a neighborhood of Los Angeles.  Moreover (in addition), many of the film studios (places where movies and TV [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-1832" style="margin: 10px;" title="Hollywood" src="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/HollywoodSign-300x200.jpg" alt="Hollywood" width="167" height="111" />Many actors dream of coming to &#8220;Hollywood&#8221; <strong>to make it big</strong> (to be a big success), and a few are probably surprised to learn that there is no city of Hollywood in California. Hollywood is actually just a <em>neighborhood</em> of Los Angeles.  <strong>Moreover</strong> (in addition), many of the film <strong>studios</strong> (places where movies and TV shows are made) are not even in that neighborhood, so the term &#8220;Hollywood&#8221; really describes the larger entertainment <strong>industry</strong> (business) in this city.  Now comes a new surprise: Most movies and TV shows aren&#8217;t even made in Hollywood/Los Angeles anymore!</p>
<p>According to a recent <a title="LAT" href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-council8-2009oct08,0,6938785.story" target="_blank"><em>Los Angeles Times</em></a> article, only about 30% of movies are now <strong>filmed</strong> (made) in California, <strong>down from</strong> (decreasing from) more than 60% just five years ago.  Only 57% of all TV shows&#8217; first episodes (called <strong>pilots</strong>) are filmed in Los Angeles, down from more than 80% in 2004.</p>
<p>So why is everyone leaving?  The reason is simple: Other cities and states are giving filmmakers <strong>incentives</strong> to film in their locations.  Incentives are things you are given to motivate you to want to do something.  These incentives are mostly <strong>financial</strong> (related to money), including lower taxes and fees for filming.  Los Angeles, however, doesn&#8217;t have any organized program of incentives, and has therefore been losing jobs to other cities and states, such as New York, Connecticut, and <strong>elsewhere</strong> (other places).</p>
<p>Los Angeles is trying to create its own incentive plan to keep the studios from moving their business to other states.  But some think it may be too late.  Soon, instead of actors dreaming of coming to Los Angeles, perhaps they&#8217;ll <strong>flock</strong> (go in large numbers) to Vancouver, Hartford, and Dallas instead.</p>
<p>~Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/10/08/hollywood-former-capital-of-movies-and-television/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giving In to Guilty Pleasures</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/08/11/giving-in-to-guilty-pleasures/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/08/11/giving-in-to-guilty-pleasures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 08:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Lucy Tse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life in the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/?p=1220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guilty pleasures are things that we enjoy, but that we are embarrassed or ashamed that we like.  There can be guilty pleasures in all categories: food, TV shows, music, sports, and more. In terms of food, one of my guilty pleasures is cake.  Other people like ice cream, chocolate, or candy.  I like cake&#8211;not the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a rel="attachment wp-att-1231" href="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/08/11/giving-in-to-guilty-pleasures/chiffon_cake_02/"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-1231 alignright" style="margin: 20px;" title="chiffon_cake_02" src="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/chiffon_cake_02-150x150.jpg" alt="chiffon_cake_02" width="150" height="150" /></a>Guilty pleasures</strong> are things that we enjoy, but that we are embarrassed or ashamed that we like.  There can be guilty pleasures in all categories: food, TV shows, music, sports, and more.</p>
<p>In terms of food, one of my guilty pleasures is cake.  Other people like ice cream, chocolate, or candy.  I like cake&#8211;not the fancy kind at fancy bakeries, though I don&#8217;t mind those either.  I am perfectly happy with a plain white (vanilla) cake with <strong>frosting</strong> (a layer of sweet icing used to decorate the top and sides of cakes).  Chocolate cake is fine, too, but I don&#8217;t need fancy fruit, cream, or other <strong>fillings</strong> (food put inside of other food).  My favorite part of birthday parties, mine and other people&#8217;s, is having cake.  It&#8217;s something that I can never<strong> turn</strong> <strong>down</strong> (refuse), and I <strong>give in to </strong>(allow myself to do something I shouldn&#8217;t) my <strong>cravings</strong> (the wanting something very badly) all too often.</p>
<p>In terms of movies, I have a lot of guilty pleasures.  My guilty pleasures fall into two categories:<br />
1) movies that I can watch over and over again (no, I won&#8217;t admit how many times I&#8217;ve seen them), and<br />
2) bad movies that I enjoy.</p>
<p>Movies like &#8220;<em>The Fugitive</em>,&#8221; &#8220;<em>Shawshank Redemption</em>,&#8221; and &#8220;<em>Roman Holiday</em>&#8221; are ones I can watch <strong>time and time again</strong> (many times).  I usually catch them on lazy weekend afternoons, <strong>surfing the channels</strong> (using the remote control to move quickly through many TV channels).</p>
<p>Then, there are the bad movies.  There was a movie I saw on television when I was young called &#8220;<em>Sooner or Later</em>&#8221; about a teenage girl who falls for a handsome 17-year-old guy.  He is (of course!) the leader of a rock band, and she lies to him about her age so he&#8217;ll be interested in her.  Okay, everything about this movie is <strong>cheesy </strong>(embarrassingly bad and of poor quality)&#8211;the acting, the script, the music, the <strong>premise</strong> (basic idea).  Still, I can&#8217;t help enjoying myself when I watch the film now.  I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s <strong>nostalgia</strong> (warm feelings for the past), but I&#8217;m not joking when I say it&#8217;s bad.</p>
<p>All right, now that I&#8217;ve <strong>confessed</strong> (admitted to something I&#8217;m not proud of or to something bad I&#8217;ve done) some of my guilty pleasures, will you confess some of yours?</p>
<p>~ Lucy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/08/11/giving-in-to-guilty-pleasures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m a Yankee Doodle Dandy</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/07/02/im-a-yankee-doodle-dandy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/07/02/im-a-yankee-doodle-dandy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jeff McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/?p=1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A popular song in the early part of the 20th century was written by a famous American composer, George M. Cohan, called &#8220;The Yankee Doodle Boy.&#8221;  It was written for a Broadway musical (a play with lots of singing and music and dancing in it) called Little Johnny Jones. It opened (had its first show) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1127" title="cagney" src="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/cagney.jpg" alt="cagney" width="181" height="139" /></p>
<p>A popular song in the early part of the 20th century was written by a famous American composer, George M. Cohan, called &#8220;The Yankee Doodle Boy.&#8221;  It was written for a Broadway <strong>musical</strong> (a play with lots of singing and music and dancing in it) called <em>Little Johnny Jones</em>. It <strong>opened</strong> (had its first show) in November of 1904.  The song became popular, however, in 1942 when there was a movie made about Cohan&#8217;s life called <em>Yankee Doodle Dandy</em>. Cohan was an actor, singer, songwriter, and producer, who was sometimes called the &#8220;man who owns <strong>Broadway</strong>.&#8221; (Broadway is the famous street in New York City where there are many famous theaters that have musical shows.)</p>
<p>Cohan was an Irish-American who wrote many plays and songs, and even starred in Hollywood movies. In the movie about his life, a fellow Irish-American actor named James Cagney <strong>played the part of</strong> (acted as the character of) Cohan. Several of Cohan&#8217;s famous songs can be heard in the movie, including &#8220;Give My Regards to Broadway,&#8221; &#8220;Your Grand Old Flag,&#8221; and &#8220;Over There.&#8221;</p>
<p>The song &#8220;The Yankee Doodle Boy&#8221; was in part about Cohan himself.  He was (according to his parents, but not his <strong>birth certificate</strong> (the official document the government creates when you are born)) born on America&#8217;s Independence Day, July 4th.  The <strong>lyrics</strong> (words) of the song refer to another song, &#8220;Yankee Doodle,&#8221; from the time of the American Revolution of the late 18th century.  A <strong>doodle</strong> was a foolish or stupid person, and <strong>Yankee</strong> (in the Revolutionary War) referred to the American colonists fighting for their independence from the British.  So a &#8220;Yankee Doodle&#8221; meant a stupid American, but because the Americans were smart enough to win the war, the song is often sung with pride.</p>
<p>Here are the words to &#8220;The Yankee Doodle Boy&#8221;:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;m a Yankee Doodle <strong>Dandy</strong><br />
A Yankee Doodle, <strong>do or die</strong><br />
<strong>A real live</strong> <strong>nephew</strong> of my <strong>Uncle Sam</strong><br />
Born on the Fourth of July</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I&#8217;ve got a Yankee Doodle <strong>sweetheart</strong><br />
She&#8217;s my Yankee Doodle joy<br />
Yankee Doodle came to London<br />
Just to ride the <strong>ponies</strong><br />
I am the Yankee Doodle Boy</p>
<p><strong>dandy</strong> = man who paid a lot (too much, usually) attention to his looks, his clothes, and/or his appearance.<strong><br />
do or die</strong> = no matter what, regardless of what happens, even if I die<strong><br />
a real live</strong> = used for emphasis to mean truly or honestly or actually<strong><br />
nephew</strong> = your father&#8217;s brother is your uncle, and you are your uncle&#8217;s <em>nephew</em><br />
<strong>Uncle Sam</strong>= traditionally represented the United States (with the same initials &#8220;US&#8221;), usually an old man with a long white beard and a red, white, and blue hat on<br />
<strong>sweetheart</strong> = your romantic love<br />
<strong>ponies</strong> = small horses, which children sometimes ride for fun</p>
<p>You can see a video of James Cagney singing and dancing in the movie <a title="Yankee Doodle Dandy" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2R1jiVcIGcg" target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>I remember my father singing this song when I was a child, and he had good reason to do so: He really was born on the 4th of July, back in 1923.  Here&#8217;s to all the other Yankee Doodle Dandies out there!</p>
<p>~Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/07/02/im-a-yankee-doodle-dandy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Movie or the Book</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/06/11/the-movie-or-the-book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/06/11/the-movie-or-the-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Lucy Tse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/?p=838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Talking about Twilight, the book and the movie, in Tuesday&#8217;s blog comments got me thinking about books that have been made into movies.  These types of screen adaptations (television or film versions) are so common today, ranging from classics (old, respected books) to modern bestsellers (books that are extremely popular). Personally, I have a very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-841" style="margin: 20px;" title="bolexh16" src="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/bolexh16-271x300.jpg" alt="bolexh16" width="211" height="233" />Talking about <em>Twilight</em>, the book and the movie, in <a href="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/06/09/on-edge-on-the-edge-and-over-the-edge/">Tuesday&#8217;s blog comments</a> got me thinking about books that have been made into movies.  These types of <strong>screen</strong> <strong>adaptations </strong>(television or film versions) are so common today, ranging from <strong>classics</strong> (old, respected books) to modern <strong>bestsellers</strong> (books that are extremely popular).</p>
<p>Personally, I have a very hard time seeing a<strong> </strong>screen adaptation after I&#8217;ve read a book.  In fact, I usually avoid it.  There are two main reasons.  First, the film version has no choice but to leave out parts of the book because of <strong>time constraints</strong> (not having enough time) and this, to me, changes the nature or <strong>scope</strong> (range) of the story.  Second, seeing a screen adaptation results in me replacing the <strong>images</strong> (pictures) I&#8217;ve formed in my mind about the book with those on the screen.  This is especially <strong>troublesome</strong> (a problem) when the ways I picture the main characters don&#8217;t match those in the film, and the film images replace those I&#8217;ve created in my own mind.  I can&#8217;t resist it.  It happens every time, and for me, that&#8217;s a sad thing.</p>
<p>This happened with one of my favorite novels, <em>I Claudius</em>, by Robert Graves.  This is a <strong>historical novel </strong>(story about real people in history) about the first Roman <strong>emperors</strong> (rulers).  In the 1970s, the BBC produced a <strong>miniseries</strong> (show with several parts) based on this novel, which many people had told me was excellent.  I finally rented the miniseries, but I couldn&#8217;t get the through the first episode.  The main character, played by an outstanding British actor, was completely different from how I had imagined him to be, and I couldn&#8217;t<strong> get past that</strong> (forget about it and move on).  Now, when I re-read the book, I can only see that actor, not the character I had created in my mind as I read the book the first time.  Another of my favorite books, <em>Lonesome Dove</em> by Larry McMurty, another historical novel, this time about the American west, has also been made into a miniseries.  Although this, too, received excellent reviews, I can&#8217;t <strong>bring myself</strong> (convince myself; force myself) to see it. I know that this is my loss, and I&#8217;m missing out on some very good films.</p>
<p>Are you like me?  Do you also have this problem?  Or, can you separate the book and the film, and not be influenced by the other?</p>
<p>~ Lucy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/06/11/the-movie-or-the-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Seven Plots of All Literature (Plus Two)</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/05/21/the-seven-plots-of-all-literature-plus-two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/05/21/the-seven-plots-of-all-literature-plus-two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 08:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jeff McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/?p=684</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently reading a fascinating book called The Art Instinct by Denis Dutton.  The books tries to show that much of our sense of art and artistic judgment is influenced by our genetics &#8211; that is, something that we are born with -  and that this instinct has evolved (slowly changed) over many, many [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently reading a fascinating book called <a title="Art Instinct" href="http://www.theartinstinct.com/" target="_blank"><em>The Art Instinct</em></a> by <a title="Dutton" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denis_Dutton" target="_blank">Denis Dutton</a>.  The books tries to show that much of our sense of art and artistic judgment is influenced by our <strong>genetics</strong> &#8211; that is, something that we are born with -  and that this instinct has <strong>evolved</strong> (slowly changed) over many, many years.  I&#8217;m not sure if I agree entirely with this argument, but it is an interesting idea.</p>
<p>In one section of the book, Dutton talks about research done by another writer, <a title="Booker" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Booker" target="_blank">Christopher Booker</a>, on the kinds of <strong>plots</strong> (story structures) that are found in the spoken and written stories of almost every language around the world.  Booker identifies seven &#8220;basic plots&#8221; that every story uses in one way or another.  Again, I&#8217;m not sure if this is true, but you may be interested in them.  Many stories may combine different kinds of plots as well:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Overcoming the Monster</em> &#8211; <strong>To overcome</strong> means to defeat, to win over.  A <strong>monster</strong> is a bad creature (person or animal).  This is a story about defeating an evil person or thing.</li>
<li><em>Rags to Riches</em> &#8211; <strong>Rags</strong> are dirty pieces of clothing; <strong>riches</strong> refers to lots of money.  This is a common expression in English, to go from &#8220;rags to riches,&#8221; especially to describe someone who works hard and becomes successful after being poor.  This is a story about someone going from being very poor to being very rich.</li>
<li><em>Quest</em> &#8211; A <strong>quest</strong> is when you search for something for a long time, usually something very important or very valuable.  Typically a quest story has a hero with others that help him in his search, and he must overcome some danger or evil in order to get his prize.  The hero gets the prize and a beautiful woman, and they often become King and Queen.</li>
<li><em>Voyage and Return</em> &#8211; A <strong>voyage</strong> is a long trip. In this kind of story, the <strong>protagonist</strong> (main character) leaves &#8220;normal experience&#8221; and goes into an <strong>alien</strong> or strange world, then returns after escaping some danger in the new world.  (The famous English children&#8217;s story <a title="Alice" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_In_Wonderland" target="_blank"><em>Alice&#8217;s Adventures in Wonderland</em></a> is an example of this.)</li>
<li><em>Comedy</em> &#8211; A rather <strong>broad</strong> (large) category, this kind of story often has some confusion until the end of the story, when the hero and his lover are united.</li>
<li><em>Tragedy</em> &#8211; A tragedy is a very sad event or situation.  Tragic stories are usually about how someone <strong>overreaches</strong> (tries to do too much or more than he or she should) and this leads to terrible <strong>consequences</strong> (results).</li>
<li><em>Rebirth</em> &#8211; A <strong>rebirth</strong> is when someone is reborn &#8211; born again.  This kind of story has the protagonist going through some dramatic change during the story, so that by the end of it he or she is essentially a new character.</li>
</ul>
<p>Booker later added two more plot types:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Rebellion</em> &#8211; A <strong>rebellion</strong> is when people try to overthrow (defeat, bring down) their government.  George Orwell&#8217;s <a title="1984" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1984_novel" target="_blank"><em>1984</em></a> would be an example of this kind of story.</li>
<li><em>Mystery</em> &#8211; A <strong>mystery</strong> involves some crime or unusual event that the protagonist tries to figure out or solve.  The protagonist is usually called a <strong>detective</strong>, and may be a police officer (but not always).</li>
</ul>
<p>So there you have all the possible plots in the world &#8211; at least, according to Mr. Booker!</p>
<p>~Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/05/21/the-seven-plots-of-all-literature-plus-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: The Worst Reality Shows</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/03/10/the-worse-reality-shows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/03/10/the-worse-reality-shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Lucy Tse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/03/10/the-worse-reality-shows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reality shows (shows about real people or real events) have become very popular in the U.S. and worldwide. There are competition shows, shows that follow celebrities around in their daily life, and many others. Even for those of us who watch reality shows, it seems that TV producers (makers of programs) are getting more and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/realitytv1.jpg" alt="realitytv1.jpg" align="right" height="260" hspace="20" vspace="20" width="303" /><strong>Reality shows </strong>(shows about real people or real events) have become very popular in the U.S. and worldwide. There are competition shows, shows that follow celebrities around in their daily life, and many others.</p>
<p>Even for those of us who watch reality shows, it seems that TV <strong>producers</strong> (makers of programs) are getting more and more <strong>desperate</strong> (wanting something very, very much and willing to do anything for it) and <strong>outrageous</strong> (shockingly bad) with show ideas.  Then again, maybe I&#8217;m just old-fashioned and these shows aren&#8217;t <strong>over the top</strong> (gone too far).</p>
<p>Here are a few reality shows that are considered to be among the very worst ever on American television. Which do you think is the worst?  Are there others&#8211;past or present&#8211;that you think are worse than these?</p>
<p>~ Lucy</p>
<p>&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>1. <strong>Who&#8217;s Your Daddy?</strong></p>
<p>A young woman who gave up a child for <strong>adoption</strong> (for someone else to legally raise as their own child) tries to pick the<strong> long-lost</strong> (has not seen for a long time) <strong>biological</strong> (by blood) father of that child. She has to pick from a group that includes several <strong>impostors</strong> (a person who pretends to be something he/she is not). If she guesses correctly, she wins $100,000.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>2. <strong>The Will</strong></p>
<p>A very wealthy <strong>rancher</strong> (person who owns a large farm) and <strong>land developer</strong> (builder) puts his large ranch <strong>estate</strong> (house, land, and valuables) <strong>up for grabs</strong> (as a prize). His friends and members of his family competed.  The winner was put in the man&#8217;s <strong>will</strong> (a document that tells others what you want to do with your belongings after you die) and will get the estate when he dies.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>3. <strong>Temptation Island</strong></p>
<p>Four unmarried couples travel to an island. They are given many <strong>temptations</strong> (desire to do something wrong) to <strong>lure them </strong>(try to get someone to do something) from their relationships. Each person spends time alone with members of the other couples in tempting situations, such as being in a <strong>hot tub</strong> (a small pool with hot water and bubbles) or in a bedroom together.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>4. <strong>Armed and Famous</strong></p>
<p>Armed and Famous puts famous celebrities on the streets as <strong>cops</strong> (police officers) in a small town in Indiana, in the Midwestern part of the U.S. The celebrities are trained to be police officers. They then go along with their training officers to <strong>patrol</strong> (watch over) the streets.  You see how the celebrities handle their training and how they operate as police officers.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>[Poll=6]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2009/03/10/the-worse-reality-shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And The Winner Is&#8230;Not an American!</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2008/02/28/and-the-winner-isnot-an-american/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2008/02/28/and-the-winner-isnot-an-american/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Jeff McQuillan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News and Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguapod.com/eslpod_blog/2008/02/28/and-the-winner-isnot-an-american/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last Sunday the annual awards for the best movies were given out (awarded, given to the winners) in Los Angeles. The awards are popularly called the Oscars, because the statue you win is called &#8220;Oscar.&#8221;  But no one is exactly sure why is it called Oscar.  (Why the Jeff or Lucy?)   The Oscars are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/03_lead_actress.jpg" alt="Oscars" title="Oscars" align="right" hspace="10" vspace="10" />Last Sunday the annual awards for the best movies were <strong>given out</strong> (awarded, given to the winners) in Los Angeles. The awards are popularly called the Oscars, because the statue you win is called &#8220;Oscar.&#8221;  But no one is exactly sure why is it called Oscar.  (Why the Jeff or Lucy?)   The Oscars are presented by the <a href="http://www.oscars.org/" target="_blank" title="Oscars">Academy of Motion Arts and Sciences</a> (<strong>hence</strong> (therefore), the ceremony is often called the Academy Awards). There is a separate category for the Best Foreign (non-American) Film, but actors and actresses from any movie, foreign or U.S.-made, can be <strong>nominated</strong> (named as a finalist) for the acting awards. The top or highest awards for acting are Best Actor (a man) and Best Actress (a woman). There are also awards for Best <strong>Supporting</strong> Actor and Actress, meaning the actors who weren&#8217;t the <strong>lead</strong> or most important actors in the movie, but were still important.</p>
<p>Many times in the past, actors from other countries have won acting Oscars, but this year, for the first time in more than 40 years, <em>all</em> of the top acting prizes &#8211; Best Actor, Best Actress, Best Supporting Actor, and Best Supporting Actress &#8211; were won by non-Americans.</p>
<p>Best Actor was given to an Irish actor, Daniel Day-Lewis, for the movie <em>There Will Be Blood</em>. Best Actress went to the young French actor, Marion Cotillard, for the movie <em>La Vie en Rose</em>. Best Supporting Actor went to the Spaniard, Javier Bardem, for the movie <em>No Country for Old Men</em>. Best Supporting Actress went to a British actress, Tilda Swinton, for her work in the movie <em>Michael Clayton</em>.</p>
<p>Movies are an international art form, so although Hollywood makes many of the most popular movies, I think it is a good thing that we recognize the great acting talents from all countries.</p>
<p>The Best Picture award went to <em>No Country for Old Men</em>, which was made by two people from my home state, Minnesota! So I guess Hollywood was the loser this year.</p>
<p>~Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2008/02/28/and-the-winner-isnot-an-american/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Movie Recommendations for Other Listeners</title>
		<link>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2008/01/29/your-movie-recommendations-for-other-listeners/</link>
		<comments>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2008/01/29/your-movie-recommendations-for-other-listeners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Lucy Tse</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Television and Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguapod.com/eslpod_blog/2008/01/29/your-movie-recommendations-for-other-listeners/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of our listeners like to watch English-language movies for enjoyment, but also to improve their English. We sometimes get emails asking for our recommendations. We don&#8217;t have specific films to recommend, but what is important is that any movie (or TV show) you watch is comprehensible, easy to understand. As another listener recently reminded [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of our listeners like to watch English-language movies for enjo<img src="http://eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/images.jpeg" alt="images.jpeg" title="images.jpeg" align="right" height="152" hspace="20" vspace="20" width="205" />yment, but also to improve their English. We sometimes get emails asking for our recommendations. We don&#8217;t have specific films to recommend, but what is important is that any movie (or TV show) you watch is <strong>comprehensible</strong>, easy to understand. As another listener recently reminded us, using the <strong>caption</strong> function on your television so that the words appear on the TV screen can help to improve comprehension, and we highly recommend doing that. <strong>Keep in mind</strong> (remember), however, that reading the caption should not <strong>interfere</strong> (prevent; get in the way) too much with your enjoyment of the movie. If you find that you&#8217;re spending all of your time reading and can&#8217;t follow the story, then this movie is too hard for you right now. Try to find something simpler.</p>
<p>In general, dramas are easier to understand than action movies or comedies, but of course, many things can make movies more or less comprehensible. Stay away from movies with too much slang, of course, and <strong>period movies </strong>(a movie set in the past) that have <strong>old-fashioned</strong> (not modern) speech. How much you know about the topic of the movie&#8211;your background knowledge&#8211;also helps to make a movie more or less comprehensible.</p>
<p><em>You</em> are the best people to ask for movie recommendations: our terrific listeners! If you have seen a movie in English that is enjoyable and easy to understand, please post a comment and let us and our other listeners know about it.</p>
<p>~ Lucy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.eslpod.com/eslpod_blog/2008/01/29/your-movie-recommendations-for-other-listeners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
